nuttyengineer wrote:
I'm really good at visualizing things, but I am totally unable to describe them without actually looking at them. And even though I can draw an object perfectly if it's sitting in front of me, I am unable to draw what is in my head.
Yes! That was what I was meaning to say, though I can never seem to say it without expending a wall of words.

Something can be as clear as day in my head but without the physical visual aid, the right image does not come out.
nuttyengineer wrote:
I also have a hard time visualizing/describing faces and am more likely to recognize someone based on other things (voice, hairstyle, posture, etc.).
Oddly, at least when it comes to repeated exposures, I seem better able to identify people based on voice rather than face. There have been many times actors (even non-famous ones) have appeared on TV and they might have looked completely different but their voice would give them away.
Here's another something odd. Take for example my cat, who is white with black spots, and whom we have had for about 14 years. If I were to try to describe him right now and give the locations and size of all of his spots, I could not do it; I doubt I could even drawn an accurate picture. However, if I were to have several cats of his type and general coloration standing before me (and if they were all acting the same so as to present no bias), I could almost certainly pick the right one based on the placement of his spots. Because the other cats' spots would just "look wrong," somehow.
I suspect this, because when I see mirror images of our cat, he looks wrong due to the reversal of the black coloration on his head.