Pieplup wrote:
Edna3362 wrote:
My real disability is my brain's and body's state that I've been coping and figuring out how to treat, not my neurology or systems.
More like my stomach, my sleep, my hormones, my intolerances, my thresholds and whatever vulnerabilities' reaction I end up with.
That may or may not include possibilities of overlooked learning disabilities and difficulties that I happened to worked around very well.
So yeah, I'm disabled.
But I intend to be a very well compensated disabled more than capable of taking care of myself, instead of a helpless one.
[color=#0077aa] so you are saying autism isnt' a disability but everything associated with autism is.
First, I speak for myself.
And, no.

Autism is still a disability.
Comorbidities and damn them.
I don't deny this exists entangled with autism, but which do you think is
more disabling than just autism itself?
Science had yet to solve this entanglement completely.
Quote:
Also what does this mean?
Quote:
But I intend to be a very well compensated disabled more than capable of taking care of myself, instead of a helpless one.
Compensation in context of overpowering or mitigating one's handicap or deficits through other means.
This is not the same boat as savantism or autistics' novelty of special interests with social models.
But more on the lines of adaptation and equipping in order to function.