ToughDiamond wrote:
kraftiekortie wrote:
I feel like it's, mostly, the ability to make another person or animal comfortable.
Though there is frequently an element of social Darwinism and the ability to be canny/"clever"----which I find irritating.
Yep, I do believe that "social skills" involve the ability to make, say, a dog or cat comfy.
Yes I've often suspected that there must be a set of social rules somewhere that are "cleaner" than some of the ones that large swathes of society seem to have degenerated into. Rules that involve a lot less deceit. I would think that skills in making animals comfortable would work quite well on humans, as long as the fine details such as throwing them sticks and constantly patting and stroking them aren't followed indiscriminately.
Different animals require different approaches. You can be much more pro-actively friendly with a dog you just met than you can with a cat, for example.
Obviously this is true of humans as well, they require a different approach and often that approach has to incorporate what people in the culture are normalized to accept.
_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. —Malcolm X
Just a reminder: under international law, an occupying power has no right of self-defense, and those who are occupied have the right and duty to liberate themselves by any means possible.