Fireblossom wrote:
Mona Pereth wrote:
I don't recall ever seeing such an attitude here on Wrong Planet, for example. Elsewhere, I've seen resentment against successful autistic people mainly not by autistic people themselves, but by parents of severely disabled autistic people, arguing that the broadness of the autistic spectrum, as currently defined, trivializes their children's problems.
I have. I'm not even talking about putting down some very famous autistic person that could even make NTs jealous, but autistic people who have been able to do everyday things that some other autistic people can't. These people often claim that the succesful one is lying. Another thing that I see here is belittleling the succesful person's skills by saying that they must be really lucky, like luck was the only reason they achieved something and skills had nothing to do with it.
Skills themselves are partly (though not entirely, of course) due to luck -- and that includes "everyday" skills. For example, one person I know is an excellent programmer but still can't tie his shoes in such a way that they stay tied for very long.
Many autistic people have lopsided ability profiles like this, and there are, alas, many who simply don't have sufficient talents to compensate for their disabilities. (There probably are many, also, who have talents that were never developed due to bad education and/or parenting.) This
is to a large degree a matter of luck, including both genetics and upbringing.
Of course, success usually requires hard work as well, but it should
not be assumed that the latter is the only factor, or that
everyone could succeed at something if only they would work hard.
Partly, yes, like the part about happening to have a good teacher (if you had one) or having parents who could afford to buy you stuff that could hone your skills.
that one makes use of those chanses.
Of course, this doesn't apply to things like winning a lottery; that's just luck.