mv wrote:
I say the best thing to do is the plan for the worst outcome but still hope for the best outcome. What took me a long, long time to learn was that no one other than me appreciates being told the "real" aspects; we're supposed to act like good little NTs and put the fake face on all the time. Long story short: what people say and what they really think can be diametrically opposed, in the NT world. There's a "social contract" that they all intuitively understand. We can understand it, too, but not naturally. We have to observe and learn in a roundabout way.
Good Lord, yes. Thank you. People are always telling me things will be fine when in fact, they have no way of knowing. On something like a major exam, in fact, if I think the results will be mediocre or bad, chances are I know better than the person assuring me that I did great - because, you know, I was the one actually there writing my exam. I tend to put across to people how I really think things will turn out (and yes, all right, I am a little bit more negative than is perhaps called for, but that just saves my getting my own or others' hopes up). I never realized this was a "social contract" type of scenario where we're actually expected to
pretend we think things will be fine; I just thought everyone else was trying to reassure me or make me believe something that had a good likelihood of not being true.
Nowadays, when someone says something like that, I mostly just shrug and say, "I hope so. We'll see," which is the best I can do without outright lying about how I think things will end up. That still makes them angry sometimes (why is it such a big deal to them that they always want me to have this oft-misplaced "self-confidence"?), but I'm not going to say I think something went well unless it's true.