Page 1 of 2 [ 19 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

randomeu
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 May 2016
Age: 28
Gender: Male
Posts: 628
Location: In the wonderful world of i dont know

13 Jul 2016, 11:30 am

I've had this issue as long as i can remember, but every time i go to speak in a conversation, the other person speaks over me and carries on, or i start talking and they comment on how i just rudely interrupted them,even though i thought it was my turn, i can't seem to get a hang of it, always interrupting people or just getting ignored. its worse on the phone, i end up talking at the same time as them, or even not at all, waiting for them to take the lead (which is awkward).

so.... how does a person know when its their turn to talk? everyone i know seems to do it perfectly so clearly theres something ive missed.


_________________
AQ score: 45

Your neurodiverse (Aspie) score: 174 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 30 of 200
You are very likely neurodiverse (Aspie)


Officially diagnosed 30th june 2017


FallingDownMan
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 27 May 2013
Age: 58
Gender: Male
Posts: 384

13 Jul 2016, 11:38 am

I have this problem as well, exactly as you describe. Hope somebody has an answer.


_________________
I finally found an avatar.


paradox_puree
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

Joined: 11 Jul 2016
Age: 44
Gender: Female
Posts: 31
Location: San Jose, CA

13 Jul 2016, 12:24 pm

Here's my algorithms for handling this based on intent scrutinization of the subject and lots of trial and error. No idea if any of it is accurate or useful, but it seems to work for me a good chunk of the time.

* If you have an idea you want to express, make small "almost talking" noises to indicate that you want to speak. Often times, this will cause them to stop after expressing an idea of their own and give you room to express an idea. They'll signal this either through silence or through explicit indications of you being allowed to talk. However, if you do this too often, I think it makes people uncomfortable, so there's some threshold to it where you shouldn't do it too often. Haven't quite figured out where that threshold is yet.

* If a person asks a question, it is now your chance to answer it.

* If a person makes a statement, there is usually a place just after the statement, where the period would typically go, where they will wait for a brief period. I think this is where people are supposed to then make supporting statements and such. Finding this gap is tricky, and if you don't jump in during that gap, people will move on assuming you have nothing to say. If you jump in too early, though, you are seen as stepping on people's thoughts.

* I've found that waiting can work with some people... If they're really good at conversation and are sufficiently empathic, they will invite you to share your thoughts, ideas, and feelings, without you having to prompt them. Just sit back, let them express their thoughts, and eventually, they may ask you "What do you think?" or "What are your thoughts on that?"

* A book I read on small talk in high school told me that the objective of conversations is to try to get the other person to talk about themself as much as possible. Give them as much space to talk about their thoughts as you can, and if they're competent/good conversationalists, they'll try to do the same for you.

* When all else fails, if I can't find clear spaces to speak, I'll interrupt and explicitly ask if I can share my thoughts.

The thing that gets me is when it is okay to change topics, or noticing when other people have changed topics. That gets so confusing for me. I haven't figured this one out yet.

Dunno if any of this is helpful. It's just some of the rules I've put together over the years based on reading up on how to do small talk and stuff like that.



Rundownshoe14
Blue Jay
Blue Jay

User avatar

Joined: 18 May 2016
Gender: Male
Posts: 83

13 Jul 2016, 12:44 pm

I imagine doing all of what paradox_puree said.
I struggle with this myself.Especially in person when I don't recognize body language that indicates they are gonna continue to speak or tone of voice.
I find it easier to talk on the phone because people in my experience only want to talk about themselves and it's hard to speak your opinion.But that's only in my experience.
It varies between each and every human you know.


_________________
"Two things are infinite:
The universe and human stupidity;and I'm not sure of the universe"-Albert Einstein


Last edited by Rundownshoe14 on 13 Jul 2016, 12:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.

paradox_puree
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

Joined: 11 Jul 2016
Age: 44
Gender: Female
Posts: 31
Location: San Jose, CA

13 Jul 2016, 12:55 pm

Rundownshoe14 wrote:
I imagine doing all of what paradox_puree said.
I struggle with this myself.Especially in person when I don't recognize body language that indicates they are gonna continue to speak or tone of voice.
I find it easier to talk on the phone because people in my experience only want to talk about themselves and it's hard to speak your opinion.But that's only in my experience.
It varies between each and every human you know.


I hate that variance. I just use the same algorithms for everyone and cross my fingers.

Oh god, body language. I forgot about that. I'm so terrified about the "talking so long people get bored" thing. I'm hyper sensitive to it, because people don't tell me when they want to change topics and use subtext, tone, implication, body language, etc. to indicate that desire.

I believe most of the problem with communication is that NTs rely so heavily on non-explicit verbal communication that most don't even consider using explicit verbal communication when it fails. They just get pissed off and upset.



randomeu
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 May 2016
Age: 28
Gender: Male
Posts: 628
Location: In the wonderful world of i dont know

13 Jul 2016, 12:59 pm

Rundownshoe14 wrote:
I imagine doing all of what paradox_puree said.
I struggle with this myself.Especially in person when I don't recognize body language that indicates they are gonna continue to speak or tone of voice.
I find it easier to talk on the phone because people in my experience only want to talk about themselves and it's hard to speak your opinion.But that's only in my experience.
It varies between each and every human you know.



ooh i think thats probably the reason why for some of it, like i start talking then suddenly they do and then they complain that i was interrupting, i dont read their body language so don't know when they are going to start talking....makes sense now


_________________
AQ score: 45

Your neurodiverse (Aspie) score: 174 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 30 of 200
You are very likely neurodiverse (Aspie)


Officially diagnosed 30th june 2017


ToughDiamond
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2008
Age: 72
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,534

13 Jul 2016, 1:02 pm

That's a big part of the reason I stick to one-on-one. The more people there are in a group, the harder it becomes to get a speaking part. For some reason I can't do this interrupting thing, I can't speak up or use anything but a soft, civilised voice unless it's a matter of life and death. So even with one-on-one I stick to soft-voiced people who leave gaps, and I have to follow the famous adage "avoid loud and aggressive persons, they are a vexation to the spirit." With groups, I've psyched myself up to jumping in during one of those tiny, infrequent gaps, but it doesn't seem to be a skill I can learn, I very quickly revert to type. And the subject matter moves on too fast for me to keep up, so by the time there is a gap, my contribution is out of date. I've tried that old Carnegie thing of getting the other person to talk about themselves, it's no doubt very powerful, but it's also rather a magnet for self-interested people - it's said that a bore is somebody who talks about themselves when you want to talk about yourself. And sadly, once I get to speak, it's often very hard for me to stop too. Wouldn't be so bad if I knew how to gently get rid of people. Good topic, it's reminded me of all the good reasons why I became rather reclusive.



randomeu
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 May 2016
Age: 28
Gender: Male
Posts: 628
Location: In the wonderful world of i dont know

13 Jul 2016, 1:04 pm

paradox_puree wrote:
Here's my algorithms for handling this based on intent scrutinization of the subject and lots of trial and error. No idea if any of it is accurate or useful, but it seems to work for me a good chunk of the time.

* If you have an idea you want to express, make small "almost talking" noises to indicate that you want to speak. Often times, this will cause them to stop after expressing an idea of their own and give you room to express an idea. They'll signal this either through silence or through explicit indications of you being allowed to talk. However, if you do this too often, I think it makes people uncomfortable, so there's some threshold to it where you shouldn't do it too often. Haven't quite figured out where that threshold is yet.

* If a person asks a question, it is now your chance to answer it.

* If a person makes a statement, there is usually a place just after the statement, where the period would typically go, where they will wait for a brief period. I think this is where people are supposed to then make supporting statements and such. Finding this gap is tricky, and if you don't jump in during that gap, people will move on assuming you have nothing to say. If you jump in too early, though, you are seen as stepping on people's thoughts.

* I've found that waiting can work with some people... If they're really good at conversation and are sufficiently empathic, they will invite you to share your thoughts, ideas, and feelings, without you having to prompt them. Just sit back, let them express their thoughts, and eventually, they may ask you "What do you think?" or "What are your thoughts on that?"

* A book I read on small talk in high school told me that the objective of conversations is to try to get the other person to talk about themself as much as possible. Give them as much space to talk about their thoughts as you can, and if they're competent/good conversationalists, they'll try to do the same for you.

* When all else fails, if I can't find clear spaces to speak, I'll interrupt and explicitly ask if I can share my thoughts.

The thing that gets me is when it is okay to change topics, or noticing when other people have changed topics. That gets so confusing for me. I haven't figured this one out yet.

Dunno if any of this is helpful. It's just some of the rules I've put together over the years based on reading up on how to do small talk and stuff like that.


yeah changing topics is lost on me, i mean, i don't do small talk at all really, haha ive found that people like to alk about themselves loads so its like a "get the popcorn, we're gonna be here a while" event then haha so i guess thats like an autopilot moment. these rules are really good, id like to add my own though which is that even though someone has stopped talking, if they are doing an action with their hands like picking something up, they usually intend to keep talking after completing this action, so they will generally count this as interrupting if you speak during it unless they have asked for you to respond.


_________________
AQ score: 45

Your neurodiverse (Aspie) score: 174 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 30 of 200
You are very likely neurodiverse (Aspie)


Officially diagnosed 30th june 2017


randomeu
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 May 2016
Age: 28
Gender: Male
Posts: 628
Location: In the wonderful world of i dont know

13 Jul 2016, 1:07 pm

ToughDiamond wrote:
That's a big part of the reason I stick to one-on-one. The more people there are in a group, the harder it becomes to get a speaking part. For some reason I can't do this interrupting thing, I can't speak up or use anything but a soft, civilised voice unless it's a matter of life and death. So even with one-on-one I stick to soft-voiced people who leave gaps, and I have to follow the famous adage "avoid loud and aggressive persons, they are a vexation to the spirit." With groups, I've psyched myself up to jumping in during one of those tiny, infrequent gaps, but it doesn't seem to be a skill I can learn, I very quickly revert to type. And the subject matter moves on too fast for me to keep up, so by the time there is a gap, my contribution is out of date. I've tried that old Carnegie thing of getting the other person to talk about themselves, it's no doubt very powerful, but it's also rather a magnet for self-interested people - it's said that a bore is somebody who talks about themselves when you want to talk about yourself. And sadly, once I get to speak, it's often very hard for me to stop too. Wouldn't be so bad if I knew how to gently get rid of people. Good topic, it's reminded me of all the good reasons why I became rather reclusive.


oh yeah, groups are like juggling competitions, you just can't win, people talking all over the place you never know whats what, my family generally have group discussions, but i can never find a way in without being told off for interrupting, but they don't care anyway, if i just don't talk then nobody complains and nobody notices, much safer that way


_________________
AQ score: 45

Your neurodiverse (Aspie) score: 174 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 30 of 200
You are very likely neurodiverse (Aspie)


Officially diagnosed 30th june 2017


paradox_puree
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

Joined: 11 Jul 2016
Age: 44
Gender: Female
Posts: 31
Location: San Jose, CA

13 Jul 2016, 1:12 pm

randomeu wrote:
ToughDiamond wrote:
That's a big part of the reason I stick to one-on-one. The more people there are in a group, the harder it becomes to get a speaking part. For some reason I can't do this interrupting thing, I can't speak up or use anything but a soft, civilised voice unless it's a matter of life and death. So even with one-on-one I stick to soft-voiced people who leave gaps, and I have to follow the famous adage "avoid loud and aggressive persons, they are a vexation to the spirit." With groups, I've psyched myself up to jumping in during one of those tiny, infrequent gaps, but it doesn't seem to be a skill I can learn, I very quickly revert to type. And the subject matter moves on too fast for me to keep up, so by the time there is a gap, my contribution is out of date. I've tried that old Carnegie thing of getting the other person to talk about themselves, it's no doubt very powerful, but it's also rather a magnet for self-interested people - it's said that a bore is somebody who talks about themselves when you want to talk about yourself. And sadly, once I get to speak, it's often very hard for me to stop too. Wouldn't be so bad if I knew how to gently get rid of people. Good topic, it's reminded me of all the good reasons why I became rather reclusive.


oh yeah, groups are like juggling competitions, you just can't win, people talking all over the place you never know whats what, my family generally have group discussions, but i can never find a way in without being told off for interrupting, but they don't care anyway, if i just don't talk then nobody complains and nobody notices, much safer that way


If the group size goes over 3 or 4, I'm toast. I need to pull off a small group to talk to, or I'm just completely unable to function. I tried to talk in a group of size 8 recently, and by the end was near a panic and literally ran away as soon as my wife and her girlfriend said they were okay leaving.



paradox_puree
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

Joined: 11 Jul 2016
Age: 44
Gender: Female
Posts: 31
Location: San Jose, CA

13 Jul 2016, 1:16 pm

randomeu wrote:
yeah changing topics is lost on me, i mean, i don't do small talk at all really, haha ive found that people like to alk about themselves loads so its like a "get the popcorn, we're gonna be here a while" event then haha so i guess thats like an autopilot moment. these rules are really good, id like to add my own though which is that even though someone has stopped talking, if they are doing an action with their hands like picking something up, they usually intend to keep talking after completing this action, so they will generally count this as interrupting if you speak during it unless they have asked for you to respond.


That's a good rule. I hadn't thought of that. I think I tend to interrupt in those cases a lot.



mikeman7918
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Mar 2016
Age: 27
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,929
Location: Utah, USA

13 Jul 2016, 1:23 pm

Yeah, I have that same problem and I will definitely try to use some of the advice in this thread. Almost every time that I am in a conversation with more then one other person I end up being left out because I don't know how to join in without interrupting.


_________________
Also known as MarsMatter.

Diagnosed with Asperger's, ADD, and Generalized Anxiety Disorder in 2004.
In denial that it was a problem until early 2016.

Deviant Art


dianthus
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 25 Nov 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,138

13 Jul 2016, 3:47 pm

paradox_puree wrote:
Here's my algorithms for handling this based on intent scrutinization of the subject and lots of trial and error. No idea if any of it is accurate or useful, but it seems to work for me a good chunk of the time.


Those were all really good suggestions and I use some of those...the only problem is I keep running into exceptions and people who don't follow those patterns.

I think some people really just like to hear themselves talk and they flat out don't care if others get a turn. I usually won't even bother trying to get a word in with those folks, BUT if I absolutely have to say something I will just butt in when I feel like it. I don't like to interrupt people but sometimes it's the only way.



ZombieBrideXD
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Jan 2013
Age: 27
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,507
Location: Canada

13 Jul 2016, 3:53 pm

I dont even have a clue i just talk whenever the lerson im talking to stops talking. But they always carry on and never stop.


_________________
Obsessing over Sonic the Hedgehog since 2009
Diagnosed with Aspergers' syndrome in 2012.
Diagnosed with Autism Spectrum Disorder Level 1 severity without intellectual disability and without language impairment in 2015.

DA: http://mephilesdark123.deviantart.com


markrh13
Hummingbird
Hummingbird

User avatar

Joined: 27 Feb 2016
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 18
Location: England

13 Jul 2016, 7:40 pm

Wow, so many of the comments here are just almost word for word what I was thinking.
I think what doesn't help in my case is that my fiancée comes from a large, loud Irish family where interrupting is almost mandatory, whether as I'm an only child from a quiet, polite English family haha!
It is a regular point of contention between us actually that she says I interrupt her before she's finished her sentence or what she's saying - I'd never made the connection before that that could be another aspergers thing for me. Guess what forum post I'll be discussing with her in the morning haha!



zer0netgain
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Mar 2009
Age: 57
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,615

14 Jul 2016, 9:12 am

I find "speaking in turn" relies more on popularity and acceptance than protocol.

People who others want to listen to can blather on about how they had burnt toast for breakfast, but if you want to comment on how you just found a cure for HIV, everyone responds with a "oh, that's nice" and resumes talking about burnt toast for breakfast.

At least, that's how it feels to me.