kraftiekortie wrote:
Yep....this is Social Darwinism in a nutshell.
In order to survive, we have to find strategies to offset this crap. I was pretty bad at it for a long time.
People often get by on delusions of security produced from integration with their social environment. They have a notion that people care about others and assist them unconditionally out of innate altruism.
The truth is more cynical, and if you struggle with social integration, one will notice how cliquish and judgmental people actually are and how conditional their compassion is, typically extending either to those most like themselves or some far away tragedy which requires philanthropy and little personal effort.
To the OP, if you are talking about political organization being suppressed, there are a lot of tactics one can use. Civil resistance is one of the great narratives of the 20th century. Your platform has to resonate broadly with public grievances and you have to be willing to use propaganda to agitate the various subgroups within your potential coalition. Great care must be taken to deny the authority the ability to justify its repression, which is why a non-violence strategy works in these contexts. It doesn't hurt to court the wealthier members of a targeted group to provide an understanding that they benefit from changing the current system because of internalized and institutional bias against them from traditionally dominant groups. Pressure and time...
_________________
We seldom realize, for example, that our most private thoughts and emotions are not actually our own. For we think in terms of languages and images which we did not invent, but which were given to us by our society - Alan Watts