[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Epgo8ixX6Wo[/youtube]
Watch the music video...
The issues presented on the self-advocacy front at times are seemingly simple. Conflict of interest arises beginning with money, ego and or security. Some issues like the positivity of autism can have to do with abortion, mainstream politics and indirectly quality of life just from simple opinions causally.
In autism politics every trait of mainstream politics co-exist. The desire to remove the concept of disease and disorder while for self-esteem reasons can indirectly affect other issues. Beginning with this quality of life notion and security framework I will use this post to analyse common issues.
There will be two divisions made in analysis. One of ethics culturally and one of adaptation in root. Above you can obviously take note of how the term disease might cause harm to the self-esteem and be a human dignities issue and from a political view a root risk to adaption and quality of life. I think it is important to realize although I am not personally privy those with some form of autism adapt on there own quite well and need no assistance. For reasons of protection of individuals in need can a division between quality of life politics and dignity with relating pride politics be made?
Pride is akin at times to an indifferent wall falling seemingly purposefully upon those unaware.
15 Dec 2010, 12:05 am
