Are overweight people more muscular?
I hope that this topic doesn't offend anyone, but I wasn't sure how else to ask it. My question is: are most overweight/obese people actually quite muscular underneath the fat?
The reason I ask is because I've recently started exercising with a weighted vest, and even with just 20-30lb, it makes a huge difference. I notice that it can be much harder to stand up, I get tired far faster than I normally would, and it generally takes a lot more effort to do just about anything. No surprises there, but I was kind of surprised at how big of a difference just a few pounds made. If someone is 50-100lb heavier, I would imagine that their muscles, in particular their legs, would have to be much stronger just for them to make it through the day and remain mobile. I would also think that things that would be relatively easy exercises, like walking, would be far more intensive for someone who is overweight.
Any thoughts? This had me curious, because being overweight is often associated with being out of shape, but in terms of muscle strength I don't know that that's the case.
No, there is nothing beneath the fat. The option is to have fat *or* muscle. When you wear the weighted vest you are exercising harder and burning more calories which gets rid of fat. But you are working very hard briefly. If you were carrying 20 pounds of fat, you would be taxing your heart and lungs 24/7, which overtaxes the body's capacity. Fat and muscle cannot be compared by weight, it just doesn't apply.
Depends what you mean by fat.
Well if you you have more body mass you need some muscle to move. So technically very light people might have less muscle mass than overweight or large people. But proportionally probably not.
However overweight people tend to get slower and less mobile, their muscles will become less able.
So there are overweight people who are fitter and more than others.
Muscle mass doesn't necessarily translate into more power. There is a German cyclist who has monster thighs, I think it is a genetic conditions, he isn't better than the very top athletes. Efficiency of the muscle for the specific job, has to be factored.
Visceral fat is the most dangerous type anyway.
If they're fat because they're lazy and/or because they consume almost nothing but junk food, then there will be very little muscle underneath.
If however they are really fit and active, and the only reason they're fat is due to the amount of food they eat, then they are going to be impressively muscular.
Ironically, the average fat but fit person is considerably more muscular than the average slim but fit person.
Also, I once read that the average morbidly obese person who is fat but fit, has twice the life expectancy of someone who is thin but unfit.
You can usually tell if someone has plenty of muscle underneath their fat, since if they don't their fat will appear significantly more saggy. Also, if you've ever grabbed their fat (one would hope with their consent) you notice that fat with muscle behind it is a lot hard to pinch/grab a handful of.
_________________
Hope is the first step on the road to disappointment, but the last step on the path to salvation.
Indeed, thee's plenty of overweight people who are bulkier due to a high amount of muscle and moderate amount of fat.
But there's also plenty of overweight people who are their size because of high amount of fat, and moderate to low amount of muscle.
The unfit/out-of-shape overweight people may still develop some muscle naturally from lunging around all that fat on their bodies all day, but it's usually the average amount of strength for an unfit thin person their age or even slightly lower.
My best friend, for instance is quite overweight/obese, and has an average amount of strength for his age. I'm lean and workout, but he's nearly my equal in arm wrestling, but slightly lower. He is capable of lifting heaver than I can with his arms, but my body is far more proportionate muscle-wise.
Here, are a few crude, simplistic charts but they clearly outline the difference between 'overweight but fit' and 'overweight and unfit':
http://i.imgur.com/wsF8w.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/rLZpB.jpg
http://i45.tinypic.com/1adkl.jpg
http://s30.postimg.org/6egtch2gx/4_DAf_OU4.jpg
@izzme, yeah, but people such as powerlifters will build a massively strong body, even if that means a bit of excess fat.
Bodybuilders have low body fats, the majority of their weight being pure muscle.
For powerlifters, they are more liberal about this and while they are mostly made up of muscle, are a bit more focused on building overall mass. This may result in them being severely obese on the BMI.
That's a myth. It's possible to have high amounts of both fat and muscle. Look at sumo wrestlers or power lifters. Also, it isn't the weight of the fat itself that's unhealthy (unless someone is so obese they can't move). It's the side effects such as buildup of deposits in the arteries and development of insulin resistance (among other effects).
That's a myth. It's possible to have high amounts of both fat and muscle. Look at sumo wrestlers or power lifters. Also, it isn't the weight of the fat itself that's unhealthy (unless someone is so obese they can't move). It's the side effects such as buildup of deposits in the arteries and development of insulin resistance (among other effects).
You are partially correct. While buildup of deposits in the arteries is the most lethal way of a coronary infraction, excessive fat also diverges the circulatory system causing the heart to work even harder, and thus, causing heart failure as well.
_________________
Sebastian
"Don't forget to floss." - Darkwing Duck
But it isn't just fat that causes the heart to work harder. Excess muscle can do that as well (if you don't condition your cardiovascular system to accommodate it). If you watch professional fighters, sometimes the guys with the most muscle lose because they tire out faster. It's a myth that muscle is everything in terms of fitness. It's also a myth that just because someone carries some extra fat they don't have good cardiovascular conditioning. Outward appearances can be misleading.
But it isn't just fat that causes the heart to work harder. Excess muscle can do that as well (if you don't condition your cardiovascular system to accommodate it). If you watch professional fighters, sometimes the guys with the most muscle lose because they tire out faster. It's a myth that muscle is everything in terms of fitness. It's also a myth that just because someone carries some extra fat they don't have good cardiovascular conditioning. Outward appearances can be misleading.
True. Any prominent exterior build causes the heart to work overtime. Some muscles and exercise is of course essential, but there are certain healthy limits a person should live by.
_________________
Sebastian
"Don't forget to floss." - Darkwing Duck
But there's also plenty of overweight people who are their size because of high amount of fat, and moderate to low amount of muscle.
The unfit/out-of-shape overweight people may still develop some muscle naturally from lunging around all that fat on their bodies all day, but it's usually the average amount of strength for an unfit thin person their age or even slightly lower.
My best friend, for instance is quite overweight/obese, and has an average amount of strength for his age. I'm lean and workout, but he's nearly my equal in arm wrestling, but slightly lower. He is capable of lifting heaver than I can with his arms, but my body is far more proportionate muscle-wise.
Here, are a few crude, simplistic charts but they clearly outline the difference between 'overweight but fit' and 'overweight and unfit':
http://i.imgur.com/wsF8w.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/rLZpB.jpg
http://i45.tinypic.com/1adkl.jpg
http://s30.postimg.org/6egtch2gx/4_DAf_OU4.jpg
So with these pics... I am definitely bearmoding it (or at least on the verge of it or built-fat)
Running based cardio has always been an issue since AS for me has given me plenty of issues with running form due to motor skill. However I can bike/Swim/Row forever.
(edit) for some reason it wasn't posting my reply... lets see if it works this time.
CockneyRebel
Veteran
Joined: 17 Jul 2004
Age: 51
Gender: Male
Posts: 121,609
Location: In my own little country
There are always exceptions though.
That's what I was thinking, from my experience anyways.
_________________
The Family Schlager
It pisses me off my severely overweight friend is slightly physically stronger than me when he's never lifted weights a day in his life, when I've been hitting the gym since Jan last year and eating healthy and still pretty skinny.
Good news is I'm catching up fast, and I'll probably soon surpass him.
And, I'll forever be more fit and healthier than he is. Dude couldn't even walk 1.6km (1mile) without constantly needing to stop and take rest breaks. Took us far longer than it would have if I went with a slimmer friend. I was barely/not fatigued at all even when the walk was over. It was a light breeze to me, a struggle for him.
| Similar Topics | |
|---|---|
| Postapocalypse and people with ASD |
06 Aug 2026, 3:30 pm |
| Are there a lot of crazy people in this world? |
21 Jul 2026, 7:31 am |
| Autistic people, would you prefer to have no developmental o |
07 Aug 2026, 7:34 am |
|
What would you do if you made people feel bad but didnt care
in Bipolar, Tourettes, Schizophrenia, and other Psychological Conditions |
06 Aug 2026, 8:40 pm |
