Living with parents kind of puts the kibosh on dating?
My other gripe is the fact that for women, its still seen as far more acceptable for them to be a parasite of some sort, whether its on their family, boyfriend, or husband. Why? Because they have body parts that 94% of men desire? Seems a pretty BS reason.
Two things: She is not a parasite if she is putting money towards the household expenses and doing household chores, even without putting out. Whether that money is earned by her getting a job or whether it is through a disability program is irrelevant. Same goes for men too. Do you think that these parasite women lie around all day, every day doing nothing except presenting those desirable body parts as needed?
Second, my son is on disability and found someone (semi long distance relationship) lived with them and a year later got married. He doesn’t drive either. She works, owns the car and does all the driving. Works ok for them. He has BPD, ASD, ADHD and some physical disabilities.
You know, there's a way to exploit that desire without any BS and without making anyone pay for it other than the men enjoying those body parts (or the full body, or even more than that) under the terms agreed to freely with their owner. No parasitism involved. Unfortunately, we like to give that transaction ugly names, to outlaw it, making it unnecessarily dangerous, and to let our blood boil if someone suggests a relative of ours might engage in it.
Ok, but women have been and still are vulnerable. Feminism, the idea of the sexes being equal, is founded on exactly that issue. I disagree with much of feminism, but this much is true. Nobody has a problem with women “sponging” or gaming the system because everyone knows women have less earning power and more physical limits than men.
People can get into relationships for whatever reasons they want, be it money, love, protection, etc. That’s their business.
But likening it to prostitution is unnecessary. It’s called the “sex industry” for a reason. Getting married is transactional, as is prostitution. Marriage is an exclusive arrangement meant to be permanent with certain goals and outcomes. Prostitution is not permanent nor exclusive. Different goals and outcomes, too, which along with the risks that go with it that many people find objectionable.
Divorce is an extension of the sex trade, in my opinion. Part of my objection to divorce is it effectively is a form of prostitution in some cases. I have no problem with the transactional nature of marriage. It’s when it’s transactional to the degree that it compromises its own permanence and exclusivity that it causes problems for all involved. If it happened to me I’d never remarry.
If a woman trades sex for a guys income it’s long term prostitution contract :p
He’ll drop her when she gets older and ugly for a young attractive woman. Lots of well off guys get 2nd, 3rd, 4th wives. It’s same as a guy paying a lady for one night, just the well off guys can’t afford long term contracts(marriage) I think those horrible people deserve each other and what they get. Only one making out is the guy in those situations though, unless the old ugly ex gets something in the divorce, but now days guys have them sign prenups, so they’ll get nothing.
Mean is it still drug deals if I have a roommate move in and I pay all his bills and exhaust he he gives me drugs? If not maybe drug uses should just have their drug deals move in to avoid legal issues.
The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 42
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,399
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.
You know, there's a way to exploit that desire without any BS and without making anyone pay for it other than the men enjoying those body parts (or the full body, or even more than that) under the terms agreed to freely with their owner. No parasitism involved. Unfortunately, we like to give that transaction ugly names, to outlaw it, making it unnecessarily dangerous, and to let our blood boil if someone suggests a relative of ours might engage in it.
Ok, but women have been and still are vulnerable. Feminism, the idea of the sexes being equal, is founded on exactly that issue. I disagree with much of feminism, but this much is true. Nobody has a problem with women “sponging” or gaming the system because everyone knows women have less earning power and more physical limits than men.
People can get into relationships for whatever reasons they want, be it money, love, protection, etc. That’s their business.
But likening it to prostitution is unnecessary. It’s called the “sex industry” for a reason. Getting married is transactional, as is prostitution. Marriage is an exclusive arrangement meant to be permanent with certain goals and outcomes. Prostitution is not permanent nor exclusive. Different goals and outcomes, too, which along with the risks that go with it that many people find objectionable.
Divorce is an extension of the sex trade, in my opinion. Part of my objection to divorce is it effectively is a form of prostitution in some cases. I have no problem with the transactional nature of marriage. It’s when it’s transactional to the degree that it compromises its own permanence and exclusivity that it causes problems for all involved. If it happened to me I’d never remarry.
In other term you'r saying...

My other gripe is the fact that for women, its still seen as far more acceptable for them to be a parasite of some sort, whether its on their family, boyfriend, or husband. Why? Because they have body parts that 94% of men desire? Seems a pretty BS reason.
Two things: She is not a parasite if she is putting money towards the household expenses and doing household chores, even without putting out. Whether that money is earned by her getting a job or whether it is through a disability program is irrelevant. Same goes for men too. Do you think that these parasite women lie around all day, every day doing nothing except presenting those desirable body parts as needed?
Second, my son is on disability and found someone (semi long distance relationship) lived with them and a year later got married. He doesn’t drive either. She works, owns the car and does all the driving. Works ok for them. He has BPD, ASD, ADHD and some physical disabilities.
The problem is men like me on disability are seen as mooches and parasites.
Most people would say your sons worthless mooch and that his wife should leave him and find someone better. That he’s just using her as a taxi since he doesn’t drive or own a car.
I hope his wife doesn’t come to resent him, like women here said they did and would.
For thst I won’t ever accept rides, live with , eat their food, accept any gifts or have them pay for anything for me from women.
So living together with a gf or marriage is out of the question for most guys like me.
Just to be clear a guy working min wage full time is also a mooch and parasite apparently.
Lady I’m dating is applying for good jobs, if she gets one she probably stop dating me.
Money gotten from disability is stolen, don’t you know taxation is theft. It’s survival of the fittest, anyone else is suppose to die, preferably somewhere out of site as not to disturb the worthy people. But don’t kill yourself as that’s not ok either, just go lay in a ditch somewhere and slowly painful die like we deserve.

goldfish21
Veteran

Joined: 17 Feb 2013
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 22,612
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
My other gripe is the fact that for women, its still seen as far more acceptable for them to be a parasite of some sort, whether its on their family, boyfriend, or husband. Why? Because they have body parts that 94% of men desire? Seems a pretty BS reason.
Now c’mon RainbowUnion, be fair here.. if Bea had a hot young twink son with a desirable bussy, some sugar daddy might pay for his keep, too.
How can I acquire a such bussy?

Running, swimming, yoga, squats, Keto diet, and no beer - only the gayest drink in the world; vodka soda.
_________________
No

Sweetleaf
Veteran

Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 35,138
Location: Somewhere in Colorado
To me, that would be something of a deal-breaker. Do you agree?
No I do not entirely agree, I mean sure for some people it may be...but it does not have to be a deal breaker in all cases.
I still lived with my mom when I started dating my boyfriend and at the time he was staying with some 'friends'(proved not to be friends later but that is a different story) but yeah he was sleeping on a living-room floor. I mean I suspect if he was set on remaining in that crammed apartment with those room-mates and I was set on staying at my moms forever maybe our relationship wouldn't have worked out.
I also did go on a few dates with a guy who was still living with his mom, I did not mind that...but then he ghosted me kind of out of the blue and I never heard from him again after multiple attempts to contact him, until a long time later after I had already moved on and was dating my current boyfriend. Messaged me on facebook and not even sure why in the hell I responded, but then he started throwing a pity party about how girls don't like him....I mean he ghosted me and I am supposed to feel sorry? And that was the end of that conversation and any future ones.
For me ghosting is a deal-breaker, I mean say I had not met my boyfriend and was still single when that guy contacted me again....I likely still would not have given a second chance. I don't care ghost me and I don't care anymore because its not worth it to me to be in a relationship with someone who has disappeared like that and could do it again if they so choose.
_________________
Eat the rich, feed the poor. No not literally idiot, cannibalism is gross.
Sweetleaf
Veteran

Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 35,138
Location: Somewhere in Colorado
She got government to pay for it. Though housing usually only pays 75% of rent. I guessing maybe her daughter is on disability. All such things are fine with women, but for men makes you a worthless unlovable loser.
Yes. Because the thinking is that she can marry a doctor, lawyer, etc, ie a MAN who will set her up.
In my country (note: a middle eastern country), unmarried and unemployment daughters have the right to continue recieving the retirement income of their highest earning deceased parents for life *regardless of age and health condition*, unless they get married.
Sons can’t unless: 1) they’re less than 18 but it stops once they’re 18.
2) it’s confirmed by a medical committe of having a disability (note. only very serious conditions like down syndome, advanced cancer or being handicaped; things like AS or HDD aren’t even viewed as disabilities here)
You can imagine how many unmarried daughters would prefer to remain unemployed and receive retirement income later which would be higher than low paid entry jobs.
Can they choose to pursue a career instead of remaining unemployed and receiving that money though?
_________________
Eat the rich, feed the poor. No not literally idiot, cannibalism is gross.
Well done, Bea. Good on you!
My family would thoroughly reject every part of me if I did this. Both my parents are ivy league grads & the rest of my family is 100% academic. My only real money is in a college fund I don't want; I'm a self-trained hacker & software geek. Not interested in crowds. If things like that were respected professionally I doubt we would be discussing this. Worked eight years? Now you're ready for a starting job cberg! Our economy is sickeningly patronizing towards ambitious young anybody.
_________________
"Standing on a well-chilled cinder, we see the fading of the suns, and try to recall the vanished brilliance of the origin of the worlds."
-Georges Lemaitre
"I fly through hyperspace, in my green computer interface"
-Gem Tos

She got government to pay for it. Though housing usually only pays 75% of rent. I guessing maybe her daughter is on disability. All such things are fine with women, but for men makes you a worthless unlovable loser.
Don’t men on disability get those perks too?
Yes but again men in disability= unlovable losers
Women on disability =dateable
The only time I hear any negative about women and benifits is the claim women have lots of kids to get welfare, otherwise I don’t hear disabled women called losers, parasites, thief’s, drain on society, worthless etc. men are expected to be successful, providers, women have no expectations to be successful since society deems it fine for them to just mooch off men.
If her daughter was a son he wouldn’t found some woman willing to let him live with her and provide for him. That doesn’t happen. Men on housing or disability are seen as the worse of worse, lowest of low. Homeless men are seen as better then men on disability as atleast they don’t accept stolen money as benifits and survive on their own.
But society says it’s fine and good for women who can’t provide for them to get benefits.
I bet you if they made all government benefits for women only the republicans would be fine with and support it. They just don’t like supporting worthless men was such men should die if they can’t be a successful middle class man.
I’ve had women on benifits reject me for being on benefits.
For record I not saying women in benefits themselves don’t feel like parasites or worthless, just that society doesn’t see them as such. Society still sees and treats women as fragile beings that need coddling as sexist as that is. Unless they see them with 5 plus kids who each get welfare. But single women with no kids on welfare is fine with society.
People have absolutely told me I'm a loser because of my job.
And, in low-income, customer-service jobs, it's not the case that customers are only sh_tty and disrespectful to male employees. If reincarnation is real, some of the men on this forum had better elect to stay men because they sure as heck wouldn't enjoy the reality of being a woman.
Lastly, it's more acceptable for men to support women (in society's eyes) because women are still expected to be the primary care-takers of children.
_________________
"If we fail to anticipate the unforeseen or expect the unexpected in a universe of infinite possibilities, we may find ourselves at the mercy of anyone or anything that cannot be programmed, categorized or easily referenced."
-XFG (no longer a moderator)
Actually we are all screwed if we don't just all support each other. One socioeconomic convention is not enough.
If any of this inequity we're actually acceptable it wouldn't be a matter of debate.
_________________
"Standing on a well-chilled cinder, we see the fading of the suns, and try to recall the vanished brilliance of the origin of the worlds."
-Georges Lemaitre
"I fly through hyperspace, in my green computer interface"
-Gem Tos

Last edited by cberg on 25 Jul 2018, 3:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
You don't have to tell, of course.
But I'm curious about how this thing is proceeding. Just curious, let me emphasize that.
Sounds like a good thing going on.
You can pm
I don’t see it going long term once she gets a job
Truth!
_________________
"If we fail to anticipate the unforeseen or expect the unexpected in a universe of infinite possibilities, we may find ourselves at the mercy of anyone or anything that cannot be programmed, categorized or easily referenced."
-XFG (no longer a moderator)
I guess he doesn't fit your pre-conceived ideas sufficiently.
My reply:
Well done, Bea. Good on you!
My family would thoroughly reject every part of me if I did this. Both my parents are ivy league grads & the rest of my family is 100% academic. My only real money is in a college fund I don't want; I'm a self-trained hacker & software geek. Not interested in crowds. If things like that were respected professionally I doubt we would be discussing this. Worked eight years? Now you're ready for a starting job cberg! Our economy is sickeningly patronizing towards ambitious young anybody.
(I'm 24)
_________________
"Standing on a well-chilled cinder, we see the fading of the suns, and try to recall the vanished brilliance of the origin of the worlds."
-Georges Lemaitre
"I fly through hyperspace, in my green computer interface"
-Gem Tos

She got government to pay for it. Though housing usually only pays 75% of rent. I guessing maybe her daughter is on disability. All such things are fine with women, but for men makes you a worthless unlovable loser.
Don’t men on disability get those perks too?
Yes but again men in disability= unlovable losers
Women on disability =dateable
The only time I hear any negative about women and benifits is the claim women have lots of kids to get welfare, otherwise I don’t hear disabled women called losers, parasites, thief’s, drain on society, worthless etc. men are expected to be successful, providers, women have no expectations to be successful since society deems it fine for them to just mooch off men.
If her daughter was a son he wouldn’t found some woman willing to let him live with her and provide for him. That doesn’t happen. Men on housing or disability are seen as the worse of worse, lowest of low. Homeless men are seen as better then men on disability as atleast they don’t accept stolen money as benifits and survive on their own.
But society says it’s fine and good for women who can’t provide for them to get benefits.
I bet you if they made all government benefits for women only the republicans would be fine with and support it. They just don’t like supporting worthless men was such men should die if they can’t be a successful middle class man.
I’ve had women on benifits reject me for being on benefits.
For record I not saying women in benefits themselves don’t feel like parasites or worthless, just that society doesn’t see them as such. Society still sees and treats women as fragile beings that need coddling as sexist as that is. Unless they see them with 5 plus kids who each get welfare. But single women with no kids on welfare is fine with society.
People have absolutely told me I'm a loser because of my job.
And, in low-income, customer-service jobs, it's not the case that customers are only sh_tty and disrespectful to male employees. If reincarnation is real, some of the men on this forum had better elect to stay men because they sure as heck wouldn't enjoy the reality of being a woman.
Lastly, it's more acceptable for men to support women (in society's eyes) because women are still expected to be the primary care-takers of children.
Haven’t you said you get mistaken for a guy?
They don’t look down on women working hose jobs like men, a lot of women who are married or in relationships work retail while their spouse works a real job and provides, this is how it’s bene since women were allowed to work in the 1900s. Well yeah rude mean customers are rude to everyone but do they look down in womennas thy do men working Retail? Most I hear is men asking them out, flirting with them or just creepy staring at them, I get why aren’t you working a real job at your age comments. How you going provide for a family working retail comments.
I’d think I’d love being a woman, but I was born male. You wouldn’t like being male unless you’ll born to a well off family. Most my family is female, all my friends are female
I quit understand reality of being female. They don’t want to be male.
Given today’s society most women don’t have kids I fail to see how that’s a valid excuse today.
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
The Hardest Part Of Living Alone |
03 Jun 2025, 2:21 pm |
My fellow Americans get used to living in a pariah state |
12 Jun 2025, 2:32 am |
Dating Site |
10 May 2025, 7:51 pm |
Hook ups and Dating |
11 May 2025, 2:11 am |