03 Jul 2020, 7:44 pm
03 Jul 2020, 7:47 pm
funeralxempire
Veteran
Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 40
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,021
Location: Right over your left shoulder
03 Jul 2020, 9:02 pm
Mountain Goat wrote:
That would be bigotry, and the penalty for bigotry is said to be two mothers in law.
Erm, I think that's bigamy.
Also, when they start telling you it's weird.
03 Jul 2020, 10:25 pm
03 Jul 2020, 11:39 pm
quite an extreme wrote:
sly279 wrote:
Pepe wrote:
You have my permission to hunt younger females.
My family would probably disown me
No risk no fun.
But I totally doubt that. Agreed.
04 Jul 2020, 12:07 am
cyberdad wrote:
The Grand Inquisitor wrote:
According to the "half your age +7" rule, you're fine if you're 22 or under (or 23 for dating someone who's 18.5). After that, the older you are, the more unusual it is. I don't think there's anything inherently wrong with it though. I'm almost 24, and I'd be open to dating an 18 year-old if there was some compatibility there.
From a man's perspective its all about biology
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/ ... -in-crisis
The article/research comes across, to me, as rather biased.
Quite an arrogant male putdown, imo.
I don't think much of "The Guardian", btw.
Perhaps masculine insecurity "Is a Thing", in part due to Political Correctness.
Men are uncertain what is and isn't acceptable in this changing social environment.
Not that I am in the dating game,
But things like gender diversity, pronouns required, outdated values being considered sexist.
Heaven help you if you offer to open a door for a woman, these days. Well, get a contract of consent first, and you are OK.
Isn't it any wonder that many men's testicles are shrivelled raisins these days?
Personally, I think the article/research ignores the influence of the evolutionary process.
It ignores that for much of human history, people didn't live that long, compared to today,
And they had to get "A Wriggle On" early if they wanted to make a significant contribution to the population growth.
Social indoctrination suppresses human impulses/instincts,
But for most of us, the instincts are still there in the chains of social expectations.
Nietzsche brought this suppression, to our attention nicely.
Meh,
I'm not impressed with the presentation of the article,
And suspect the integrity of the interpretation of the findings.
I can't be bothered doing more research into the matter.
The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 42
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,310
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.
04 Jul 2020, 12:15 am
Pepe wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
The Grand Inquisitor wrote:
According to the "half your age +7" rule, you're fine if you're 22 or under (or 23 for dating someone who's 18.5). After that, the older you are, the more unusual it is. I don't think there's anything inherently wrong with it though. I'm almost 24, and I'd be open to dating an 18 year-old if there was some compatibility there.
From a man's perspective its all about biology
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/ ... -in-crisis
The article/research comes across, to me, as rather biased.
Quite an arrogant male putdown, imo.
I don't think much of "The Guardian", btw.
Perhaps masculine insecurity "Is a Thing", in part due to Political Correctness.
Men are uncertain what is and isn't acceptable in this changing social environment.
Not that I am in the dating game,
But things like gender diversity, pronouns required, outdated values being considered sexist.
Heaven help you if you offer to open a door for a woman, these days. Well, get a contract of consent first, and you are OK.
Isn't it any wonder that many men's testicles are shrivelled raisins these days?
Personally, I think the article/research ignores the influence of the evolutionary process.
It ignores that for much of human history, people didn't live that long, compared to today,
And they had to get "A Wriggle On" early if they wanted to make a significant contribution to the population growth.
Social indoctrination suppresses human impulses/instincts,
But for most of us, the instincts are still there in the chains of social expectations.
Nietzsche brought this suppression, to our attention nicely.
Meh,
I'm not impressed with the presentation of the article,
And suspect the integrity of the interpretation of the findings.
I can't be bothered doing more research into the matter.
This idiot author is basically saying that all men are pedophiles, preferring girls not older than 18. lol
04 Jul 2020, 12:23 am
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
Pepe wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
The Grand Inquisitor wrote:
According to the "half your age +7" rule, you're fine if you're 22 or under (or 23 for dating someone who's 18.5). After that, the older you are, the more unusual it is. I don't think there's anything inherently wrong with it though. I'm almost 24, and I'd be open to dating an 18 year-old if there was some compatibility there.
From a man's perspective its all about biology
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/ ... -in-crisis
The article/research comes across, to me, as rather biased.
Quite an arrogant male putdown, imo.
I don't think much of "The Guardian", btw.
Perhaps masculine insecurity "Is a Thing", in part due to Political Correctness.
Men are uncertain what is and isn't acceptable in this changing social environment.
Not that I am in the dating game,
But things like gender diversity, pronouns required, outdated values being considered sexist.
Heaven help you if you offer to open a door for a woman, these days. Well, get a contract of consent first, and you are OK.
Isn't it any wonder that many men's testicles are shrivelled raisins these days?
Personally, I think the article/research ignores the influence of the evolutionary process.
It ignores that for much of human history, people didn't live that long, compared to today,
And they had to get "A Wriggle On" early if they wanted to make a significant contribution to the population growth.
Social indoctrination suppresses human impulses/instincts,
But for most of us, the instincts are still there in the chains of social expectations.
Nietzsche brought this suppression, to our attention nicely.
Meh,
I'm not impressed with the presentation of the article,
And suspect the integrity of the interpretation of the findings.
I can't be bothered doing more research into the matter.
This idiot author is basically saying that all men are pedophiles, preferring girls not older than 18. lol
Is it politically incorrect of me say she is a fool?
You get a lot of "Tripe" from The Guardian.
04 Jul 2020, 12:30 am
funeralxempire wrote:
Erm, I think that's bigamy.
Why?
What did you do?
<Boom> <tish>
04 Jul 2020, 12:34 am
04 Jul 2020, 1:08 am
04 Jul 2020, 1:20 am
cyberdad wrote:
IMO the author of the article is making assumptions that align with their agenda. But the scientific convention is that males are biologically programmed to mate with as many younger "reproductively mature females as possible,
However most males are educated to understand social, religious and cultural norms and can make the cognitive leap forward to not harass younger females. I say most because there will always be older men who will sleep with young women if the opportunity arises.
However most males are educated to understand social, religious and cultural norms and can make the cognitive leap forward to not harass younger females. I say most because there will always be older men who will sleep with young women if the opportunity arises.
Agreed.
But my point is:
The "Instinct" is still there.
And, men are not responsible for what evolution has instilled.
They simply have to abide by the social standards of their respective communities.
If you read what I am saying as a license to do whatever they want, you are wrong.
04 Jul 2020, 1:22 am
kraftiekortie wrote:
There will always be older and younger men who dig elegant, sophisticated, older women as well.
Of course.
04 Jul 2020, 1:37 am
quite an extreme wrote:
sly279 wrote:
Pepe wrote:
You have my permission to hunt younger females.
My family would probably disown me
No risk no fun.
But I totally doubt that. They get upset when a 26 old dates a 19 year old
Or when a 21 old they know is dating a 26 old loser
04 Jul 2020, 1:57 am
04 Jul 2020, 2:00 am
Pepe wrote:
And, men are not responsible for what evolution has instilled.
They simply have to abide by the social standards of their respective communities.
:
They simply have to abide by the social standards of their respective communities.
:
Yes and most younger women aren't interested in oldies unless they are very very rich
| Similar Topics | |
|---|---|
| Looking for help with date suggestions |
29 Apr 2025, 5:56 pm |
| Weird |
31 Mar 2025, 12:07 am |
| Cool date destinations |
27 May 2025, 7:28 am |
| Self imposed pressure to find someone to date |
27 May 2025, 12:40 pm |
