The autism social rule book.

Post Reply New Topic

It's especially true among the status seekers. I attended one management meeting where concern was expressed about how to meet the specification for testing some high pressure equipment, so not just the usual business concerns, but also a potential bomb, as all pressure vessels are (but don't worry, the factors of safety are especially stringent, and more so for testing equipment) but not to worry: my immediate superior, in his usual inimitable style, confidently proposed that the issue could be resolved by using a Dome Load Controller.

You could see the relief spread about the room like a ripple in a pond; problem solved, this guy obviously knows what he's talking about, so let's move on...

Evidently, not one of them, including my boss, had the faintest idea what a Dome Load Controller does.

When I ask "how are you?" I'm really expecting you to say "good" honestly I'm just using that to break the ice. And 90% of the time it's how it goes.
The rule is to be prepared for when someone wants to offload some of their drama on to you. Likely when they do they only want a sympathetic ear and not any form of advice unless they specifically ask for advice.

I can understand and agree with this rule in an educational setting, where everyone has to get a chance in order to learn, but anywhere else? Nah, fam. I'm totally answering every question I can.

There's a book I'v heard of (but never come across, that's entitled something like "How to get on with girls" and a probable copy of it in Harry Potter; How to get on with witches, so how come none of these "autism experts" have come up with "How to get on with Autistics"? Well, no one wants to read that, but how about one entitled how to get on with herd humans?

The first problem is that they it never occurs to them that one is needed; to them it is "obvious" that Hello, how are you (for example) is not an enquiry about your health, but translates more like "I like you and wish to converse with you".

There are so many of these misunderstandinsg I've come across over the years, like how we have a reputation for being moaners? It often arose in work that I'd see fellowengineers doing something badly, and thought it my duty to ponit them to a better way. The normal response was to listen politely, and then carry on doing as previously. This led me to suspect I hadn't explained myself properly, so I'd try again, with the same result. It's only quite recently that I came to understand that most people aren't interested in thebest way of doing something; he are much more interested in sticking with what they knew. I just didn't get it that they wanted to stay in their comforts zonzes, and I was just being anoying!

If you have an enemy (ie, a bully), and your friends still talk to them, don't get upset with your friends if they're not trying to spite you or anything. I've always understood this but a lot of people don't, especially those on the spectrum, and it isn't healthy to expect everyone to stop talking to someone just because you don't like that person. Sure, it may feel a little upsetting to see your friends talking to a person who they've seen bully you, but if they're not doing it out of spite or they're not allowing themselves to be poisoned against you by the bully or they're still your friends and respect you, then they're keepers, and you shouldn't make them feel guilty for talking to someone you hate if they happen to get on with that person.

I think that this is a healthy perspective, Tamaya.