What are your pet peeves in social situations?
uncommondenominator wrote:
Summer_Twilight wrote:
A few of them
1. Whenever someone seems to play mind games by asking you a question. When you answer, that person says "No that's not my question." That one really pushes my buttons. Another thing they do is "That still does not tell me anything."
2. Whenever someone asks you for something or they agree to do something with you. Then when it boils down to it, this person ends up springing it up on you that they have to get XYZ first. To make it worse, they take their time doing XYZ and then wondering why you left or got mad at them.
1. Whenever someone seems to play mind games by asking you a question. When you answer, that person says "No that's not my question." That one really pushes my buttons. Another thing they do is "That still does not tell me anything."
2. Whenever someone asks you for something or they agree to do something with you. Then when it boils down to it, this person ends up springing it up on you that they have to get XYZ first. To make it worse, they take their time doing XYZ and then wondering why you left or got mad at them.
If it's any consolation, it has been my experience that your #1 is not a mind game, but a misunderstanding. Either you've misunderstood the context of their question, or they've misunderstood the context of the answer. Like if someone asked "where are you from" and you start listing all the places you lived, but they meant "what is your heritage". (lazy example, hopefully it conveys the idea) Not everyone is adept with words, and sometimes what they mean to ask doesn't get communicated as clearly as could ideally be - and when the answer doesn't match the question they asked, as they see it, the got an answer that didn't match the intent of their question.
Same goes for "that tells me nothing". It usually means someone didn't understand the intent of the question asked or the answer given, and while information was provided, it didn't answer the intended question. I usually remedy either of the above by saying "sorry then, I seem to have missed the intent of your question - what sort of answer were you expecting?" - and give a revised answer based on additional context - or, if it didn't help, simply say I dunno what else to tell them then. But rest assured, it's generally not intended as a mind game or to wind you up.
Agreed.
But it can sometimes be hard to tell the difference between a genuine misunderstanding and a mind game.
When in doubt, I think it's best to be charitable and assume that a misunderstanding is genuine and work to try to clear up the misunderstanding.
Unfortunately, people who have grown up around highly manipulative people tend to assume that everything is a mind game and that genuine misunderstandings are rare.
_________________
- Autistic in NYC - Resources and new ideas for the autistic adult community in the New York City metro area.
- Autistic peer-led groups (via text-based chat, currently) led or facilitated by members of the Autistic Peer Leadership Group.
I developed sooo many pet peeves working at a grocery store. One was customers being on the phone while I was ringing up their groceries.
_________________
He/him or they/them pronouns, please.
ASD level 1 & ADHD-C (professional dx), dyscalcula (self dx), very severe RSD. Probably have BPD.
RAADs: 104 | ASQ: 30 | CAT-Q: 139 | Aspie Quiz: 116/200 (84% probability of being atypical)
funeralxempire
Veteran

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 40
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,277
Location: Right over your left shoulder
Mona Pereth wrote:
Unfortunately, people who have grown up around highly manipulative people tend to assume that everything is a mind game and that genuine misunderstandings are rare.
This is true whether or not the people around them were genuinely manipulative. If someone has always had the attitude that those around them are manipulative, they're likely to operate from the assumption that everyone is playing mind games, even if that's not actually true.
_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. —Malcolm X
There’s class warfare, all right, but it’s my class, the rich class, that’s making war, and we’re winning. — Warren Buffett
funeralxempire wrote:
Mona Pereth wrote:
Unfortunately, people who have grown up around highly manipulative people tend to assume that everything is a mind game and that genuine misunderstandings are rare.
This is true whether or not the people around them were genuinely manipulative. If someone has always had the attitude that those around them are manipulative, they're likely to operate from the assumption that everyone is playing mind games, even if that's not actually true.
Hmmm. I would be inclined to suspect that most people like this are likely to have had some genuine bad experiences with highly manipulative people, when growing up, but then over-generalize from those bad experiences and jump to wrong conclusions about other people.
_________________
- Autistic in NYC - Resources and new ideas for the autistic adult community in the New York City metro area.
- Autistic peer-led groups (via text-based chat, currently) led or facilitated by members of the Autistic Peer Leadership Group.
CapedOwl wrote:
uncommondenominator wrote:
Summer_Twilight wrote:
A few of them
1. Whenever someone seems to play mind games by asking you a question. When you answer, that person says "No that's not my question." That one really pushes my buttons. Another thing they do is "That still does not tell me anything."
1. Whenever someone seems to play mind games by asking you a question. When you answer, that person says "No that's not my question." That one really pushes my buttons. Another thing they do is "That still does not tell me anything."
If it's any consolation, it has been my experience that your #1 is not a mind game, but a misunderstanding. Either you've misunderstood the context of their question, or they've misunderstood the context of the answer. Like if someone asked "where are you from" and you start listing all the places you lived, but they meant "what is your heritage".
A valuable tip I've learned, is to ask NT people the following golden question:
What is the context?
So for example, the NT person asks "where are you from"? And you don't have a clear or comfortable sense of where they plan to go with this line of questioning. Any tiny sense of doubt or puzzlement is enough. Owing to catching these feelings, these cues, one doesn't take the obvious next step (of just answering it, too easily and straightforward, as Autistic people are known to do), but rather responds with another question:
What is the context?
Please take your sweet time pausing, before answering, and please use it often my friends!

-> A golden question indeed CapedOwl


but truly a great question, and suggestion!
funeralxempire
Veteran

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 40
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,277
Location: Right over your left shoulder
Mona Pereth wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
Mona Pereth wrote:
Unfortunately, people who have grown up around highly manipulative people tend to assume that everything is a mind game and that genuine misunderstandings are rare.
This is true whether or not the people around them were genuinely manipulative. If someone has always had the attitude that those around them are manipulative, they're likely to operate from the assumption that everyone is playing mind games, even if that's not actually true.
Hmmm. I would be inclined to suspect that most people like this are likely to have had some genuine bad experiences with highly manipulative people, when growing up, but then over-generalize from those bad experiences and jump to wrong conclusions about other people.
Agreed; but they don't even need to be the majority in that person's life, so long as they're influential enough.
Although, that's assuming that person is genuinely manipulative, rather than just sharing their paranoias.
_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. —Malcolm X
There’s class warfare, all right, but it’s my class, the rich class, that’s making war, and we’re winning. — Warren Buffett
Last edited by funeralxempire on 30 Jun 2025, 12:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Mona Pereth wrote:
uncommondenominator wrote:
Summer_Twilight wrote:
A few of them
1. Whenever someone seems to play mind games by asking you a question. When you answer, that person says "No that's not my question." That one really pushes my buttons. Another thing they do is "That still does not tell me anything."
2. Whenever someone asks you for something or they agree to do something with you. Then when it boils down to it, this person ends up springing it up on you that they have to get XYZ first. To make it worse, they take their time doing XYZ and then wondering why you left or got mad at them.
1. Whenever someone seems to play mind games by asking you a question. When you answer, that person says "No that's not my question." That one really pushes my buttons. Another thing they do is "That still does not tell me anything."
2. Whenever someone asks you for something or they agree to do something with you. Then when it boils down to it, this person ends up springing it up on you that they have to get XYZ first. To make it worse, they take their time doing XYZ and then wondering why you left or got mad at them.
If it's any consolation, it has been my experience that your #1 is not a mind game, but a misunderstanding. Either you've misunderstood the context of their question, or they've misunderstood the context of the answer. Like if someone asked "where are you from" and you start listing all the places you lived, but they meant "what is your heritage". (lazy example, hopefully it conveys the idea) Not everyone is adept with words, and sometimes what they mean to ask doesn't get communicated as clearly as could ideally be - and when the answer doesn't match the question they asked, as they see it, the got an answer that didn't match the intent of their question.
Same goes for "that tells me nothing". It usually means someone didn't understand the intent of the question asked or the answer given, and while information was provided, it didn't answer the intended question. I usually remedy either of the above by saying "sorry then, I seem to have missed the intent of your question - what sort of answer were you expecting?" - and give a revised answer based on additional context - or, if it didn't help, simply say I dunno what else to tell them then. But rest assured, it's generally not intended as a mind game or to wind you up.
Agreed.
But it can sometimes be hard to tell the difference between a genuine misunderstanding and a mind game.
When in doubt, I think it's best to be charitable and assume that a misunderstanding is genuine and work to try to clear up the misunderstanding.
Unfortunately, people who have grown up around highly manipulative people tend to assume that everything is a mind game and that genuine misunderstandings are rare.
That's.....one way to look at things.
I thought of 2 more:
-When people speak for me. As in: 'We can take you out swimming some day'.
-When people project their struggles onto me: As in: 'I don't think you're ready for this or that yet'.
_________________
Live life like a crow:
-Collect shiny things
-Do a sassy walk for no apparent reason
-Scream if you're having fun
-Trust your intuition
-Be playful
Mona Pereth wrote:
Hmmm. I would be inclined to suspect that most people like this are likely to have had some genuine bad experiences with highly manipulative people, when growing up, but then over-generalize from those bad experiences and jump to wrong conclusions about other people.
The above is not as necessary as one might think. Perception of reality (even when wrong) can be even more potent than what reality actually is. Expectation has a lot to do with it, and expectations are very much not always reasonable or rational. An example:
I had a friend who spent many years being annoyed that he made less money than he thought he should. Specifically, he was making less than the "average household income". In that context, he thought he was making less-than-average, and was being underpaid.
It wasn't until I explained to him that the "average household income" was defined by a household of 2.4 people - two adults both earning an income, plus any applicable deductions - that he realized he was actually earning over 50% more than the average individual.
Incomplete information was enough to bias him into absolutely believing that he was being massively underpaid, and essentially being taken advantage of - even though he was actually being paid quite a lot more than most others. Once he learned this, he stopped complaining about being underpaid, and even put more effort into his work, which then landed him a promotion, and he got paid even more.
Point is, if someone even believes they're being manipulated, even if they actually aren't, that's enough to make it "real" for them, even if it isn't actually the reality.
Many people are also a bit hypersensitive, and take things much more harshly than they are actually delivered. I once worked with a young lady whom I had to politely ask to not open the cash register w/o a manager, in totally calm tones, with no harshness or accusatory innuendo. Yet she reported to the owner that I yelled at her to stay out of the register. When they played back the camera footage, it showed that I had in fact spoken calmly and politely the entire time. Her perception made her own recollection real enough to her, though.
Sometimes all it takes is one slightly bad experience to ruin everything.
It used to annoy me when people would ask me questions about my tourette, and they'd start with the most cliche and stereotypical questions, and I'd think they were just messing with me. But in reality, I forgot that while I may know about tourette, that's cos I have it, and was told about it - but the average person has never even heard of it, of if they have, it's probably from a movie like Deuce Bigalow - which isn't their fault, it's just how things are. And even if someone asks the most stereotypical question, it's likely cos they don't know better - but are still genuinely trying to learn and understand.
Point is, if it seems like someone is messing with you, it can't hurt to indulge them for a moment, and actually find out for sure. I once thought a group of kids in a car were trying to harass me, but in fact they were trying to let me know I didn't have my headlights on.
Just something to consider when it comes to peeves and other indiscretions.
Even regarding my own peeves, I can easily think of realistic exceptions where I may not be in the right. For example, my earlier peeve, of being expected to share someone else's enthusiasm - if it's someone close to me, someone I care about and support, then even if I don't share their enthusiasm for the thing, I am likely to be enthusiastic for them being happy about something, even if I literally could not care less about the thing itself.
It has been my experience that most people aren't actually trying to play mind games - but just cos two people are both speaking in english, doesn't mean they're both speaking the same "language". Miscommunications happen. Misunderstanding occur.
uncommondenominator wrote:
Mona Pereth wrote:
Hmmm. I would be inclined to suspect that most people like this are likely to have had some genuine bad experiences with highly manipulative people, when growing up, but then over-generalize from those bad experiences and jump to wrong conclusions about other people.
The above is not as necessary as one might think. Perception of reality (even when wrong) can be even more potent than what reality actually is. Expectation has a lot to do with it, and expectations are very much not always reasonable or rational. An example:
I had a friend who spent many years being annoyed that he made less money than he thought he should. Specifically, he was making less than the "average household income". In that context, he thought he was making less-than-average, and was being underpaid.
It wasn't until I explained to him that the "average household income" was defined by a household of 2.4 people - two adults both earning an income, plus any applicable deductions - that he realized he was actually earning over 50% more than the average individual.
Incomplete information was enough to bias him into absolutely believing that he was being massively underpaid, and essentially being taken advantage of - even though he was actually being paid quite a lot more than most others. Once he learned this, he stopped complaining about being underpaid, and even put more effort into his work, which then landed him a promotion, and he got paid even more.
Point is, if someone even believes they're being manipulated, even if they actually aren't, that's enough to make it "real" for them, even if it isn't actually the reality.
Many people are also a bit hypersensitive, and take things much more harshly than they are actually delivered. I once worked with a young lady whom I had to politely ask to not open the cash register w/o a manager, in totally calm tones, with no harshness or accusatory innuendo. Yet she reported to the owner that I yelled at her to stay out of the register. When they played back the camera footage, it showed that I had in fact spoken calmly and politely the entire time. Her perception made her own recollection real enough to her, though.
Sometimes all it takes is one slightly bad experience to ruin everything.
It used to annoy me when people would ask me questions about my tourette, and they'd start with the most cliche and stereotypical questions, and I'd think they were just messing with me. But in reality, I forgot that while I may know about tourette, that's cos I have it, and was told about it - but the average person has never even heard of it, of if they have, it's probably from a movie like Deuce Bigalow - which isn't their fault, it's just how things are. And even if someone asks the most stereotypical question, it's likely cos they don't know better - but are still genuinely trying to learn and understand.
Point is, if it seems like someone is messing with you, it can't hurt to indulge them for a moment, and actually find out for sure. I once thought a group of kids in a car were trying to harass me, but in fact they were trying to let me know I didn't have my headlights on.
Just something to consider when it comes to peeves and other indiscretions.
Even regarding my own peeves, I can easily think of realistic exceptions where I may not be in the right. For example, my earlier peeve, of being expected to share someone else's enthusiasm - if it's someone close to me, someone I care about and support, then even if I don't share their enthusiasm for the thing, I am likely to be enthusiastic for them being happy about something, even if I literally could not care less about the thing itself.
It has been my experience that most people aren't actually trying to play mind games - but just cos two people are both speaking in english, doesn't mean they're both speaking the same "language". Miscommunications happen. Misunderstanding occur.
Very well said and explained.

People view the world through their past experiences in life, and not necessarily experience what is really happening.
_________________
Live life like a crow:
-Collect shiny things
-Do a sassy walk for no apparent reason
-Scream if you're having fun
-Trust your intuition
-Be playful
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Online Behaviour - Pet Peeves |
18 Jun 2025, 7:03 am |
Social Security |
22 Apr 2025, 8:42 pm |
I don't fit in with social groups for others with autism |
25 Jun 2025, 2:18 pm |
Loading… Social Interaction.exe |
02 Jun 2025, 9:16 am |