CapedOwl wrote:
Revolutions tend to go really, really badly. Basically, one group of totally corrupt narcissists/machiavellians/psychopaths are replaced with a very comparably corrupt, different group of narcissists/machiavellians/psychopaths, who ostensibly champion a competing ideology.
Since nobody really looks at the psychology of these leaders in any serious or meaningful way, nothing really changes in the way of a promised utopia getting any closer. These leaders know all too well that all they have to do is convincingly promise such a utopia, but then wouldn't you know it, they never actually deliver it. In a nutshell, power in the hands of dark psychology just shifts to other people with very comparable dark psychology. Power is siezed by one such group after another, all awaiting their turn and opportunity.
At some point in my teens, I ran across the phrase "The Revolution is always betrayed by its leaders." Not sure what that's a quote from, but nothing I've learned about since has contradicted that statement.
_________________
You're so vain
I bet you think this sig is about you