New York cancels use of "mentally ret*d" as official term

Page 3 of 3 [ 44 posts ] Go to page Previous 1, 2, 3

Previous topic | Next topic

ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 38,075
Location: Long Island, New York

06 Aug 2022, 10:11 am

cyberdad wrote:

ASPartOfMe wrote:

Language policing is more often than not is being insensitive.

I think it's needs to be done right. There is an art to doing it.

Quite clearly ramming it down people's throats using the legal system isn't working.

Individualistic societies are where people don't like the government telling them what they can say.

Can not disagree with any of the above.

_________________
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity.

“My autism is not a superpower. It also isn’t some kind of god-forsaken, endless fountain of suffering inflicted on my family. It’s just part of who I am as a person”. - Sara Luterman

CockneyRebel
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 17 Jul 2004
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 118,413
Location: In my little Olympic World of peace and love

06 Aug 2022, 10:19 am

kraftiekortie wrote:

"Mentally ret*d" is not the correct term for somebody with "intellectual disability"----whether one is "woke" or not "woke." And it hasn't been for quite a long time.

Just because "idiot" was an official medical term back in the 1920s----doesn't mean it's a correct term nowadays (obviously!). Language evolves.

I agree. I don't think the term should be in use any more. And I think that people should stop throwing the R-word around like confetti.

_________________
The Family Enigma

DavidJSNSW64
Tufted Titmouse

Joined: 4 Aug 2021
Age: 60
Gender: Male
Posts: 44
Location: Sydney, Australia

31 Aug 2022, 5:25 pm

I don't know if you can 'cancel' a particular term. What you can do is to make it clear there are consequences if you use it. Like if I was to call a someone a 'dickhead' in close proximity. Sure I can do that but I can't control what happens afterwards.

cyberdad
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Age: 57
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,036

01 Sep 2022, 6:03 am

DavidJSNSW64 wrote:

That's exactly what they are laying the groundwork for, It's called operant conditioning, Punishment leading to extinction of the behaviour.

ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 38,075
Location: Long Island, New York

01 Sep 2022, 10:52 am

cyberdad wrote:

DavidJSNSW64 wrote:

That's exactly what they are laying the groundwork for, It's called operant conditioning, Punishment leading to extinction of the behaviour.

It never occurred to me that wokes are ABA’rs. Just another reason to oppose cancel culture.

CockneyRebel
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 17 Jul 2004
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 118,413
Location: In my little Olympic World of peace and love

01 Sep 2022, 12:46 pm

kraftiekortie wrote:

They probably should have done that 30 years ago…”mentally ret*d” was outdated even then.

I agree. It should have been done a lot sooner.

_________________
The Family Enigma

funeralxempire
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 40
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,511
Location: Right over your left shoulder

01 Sep 2022, 3:10 pm

ASPartOfMe wrote:

cyberdad wrote:

DavidJSNSW64 wrote:

That's exactly what they are laying the groundwork for, It's called operant conditioning, Punishment leading to extinction of the behaviour.

It never occurred to me that wokes are ABA’rs. Just another reason to oppose cancel culture.

I'm not sure punishment for infractions is inherently ABA, unless judicial systems are also made up of ABAers.

_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. —Malcolm X
Just a reminder: under international law, an occupying power has no right of self-defense, and those who are occupied have the right and duty to liberate themselves by any means possible.

cyberdad
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Age: 57
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,036

01 Sep 2022, 4:43 pm

ASPartOfMe wrote:

cyberdad wrote:

DavidJSNSW64 wrote:

That's exactly what they are laying the groundwork for, It's called operant conditioning, Punishment leading to extinction of the behaviour.

It never occurred to me that wokes are ABA’rs. Just another reason to oppose cancel culture.

If you put it that way, MAGAs are like naughty children who need disciplining :lol:

ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 38,075
Location: Long Island, New York

01 Sep 2022, 10:24 pm

cyberdad wrote:

ASPartOfMe wrote:

cyberdad wrote:

DavidJSNSW64 wrote:

That's exactly what they are laying the groundwork for, It's called operant conditioning, Punishment leading to extinction of the behaviour.

It never occurred to me that wokes are ABA’rs. Just another reason to oppose cancel culture.

If you put it that way, MAGAs are like naughty children who need disciplining :lol:

Their leader is tantruming, not having meltdowns.

cyberdad
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Age: 57
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,036

02 Sep 2022, 3:50 am

ASPartOfMe wrote:

[
Their leader is tantruming, not having meltdowns.

Mona Pereth
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Sep 2018
Gender: Female
Posts: 8,690
Location: New York City (Queens)

18 Sep 2022, 1:06 am

ASPartOfMe wrote:

If a word used as a diagnosis becomes scientifically inaccurate I have no objection to changing the term. “Mental Retardation” if used literally is not less accurate then “Intellectual Disability”.

Actually, it is.

"Mental Retardation" was ambiguous, insofar as it was usually defined as meaning roughly the equivalent of "intellectually disabled," but literally sounds like it should mean "developmentally delayed," which is not the same thing.

At the time the term "mental retardation" was coined, it was not yet recognized that there could be such a thing as what is now called "developmental disability" without "intellectual disability." For example, all autistic people are "developmentally disabled," but only some of us are "intellectually disabled."

So the new terminology is not just more "politically correct," but also more precise.

_________________
- Autistic in NYC - Resources and new ideas for the autistic adult community in the New York City metro area.
- Autistic peer-led groups (via text-based chat, currently) led or facilitated by members of the Autistic Peer Leadership Group.

ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 38,075
Location: Long Island, New York

18 Sep 2022, 9:01 am

Mona Pereth wrote:

ASPartOfMe wrote:

So what you are saying “mental retardation” has multiple subcategories two of which are “intellectual disability” and “developmental disability” . There is nothing wrong with creating subcategories as knowledge increases. But that is not why the term “mental retardation” fell into disfavor. It was because “ret*d” and then “ret*d” became an insult.

‘Autism” is probably more ambiguous then “Mental Retardation” ever was but despite the word becoming an insult there is yet no significant pressure to change it, and what little there is, is about its being ambiguous not about it becoming an insult.

So with “mental retardation” arguably the right thing was done for arguably the wrong reason.

Page 3 of 3 [ 44 posts ] Go to page Previous 1, 2, 3

Jump to:

New York cancels use of "mentally ret*d" as official term Post Reply New Topic

New York cancels use of "mentally ret*d" as official term