blitzkrieg wrote:
The article doesn't approach the topic of ethnicity or which sex a person is.
The content includes (in reference to Philip Gold of the NIH):
"But he believes that everyday conditions are more likely to lead to depression now than in the past.
These take many forms and include a rise in stimuli of all kinds, such as information overload, artificial light, mobile phones, together with increasingly intense social interactions – largely as a result of new technology, for example, angry Twitter exchanges and physical overcrowding."
The article to me strikes me as something which criticises modern life, specifically in relation to technology.
I don't think it was trying to be everything and to include the benefits of being a white male in the 1950's, or any other social commentary related to that.
Then the good doctor needs to reframe the inference. Its not just ethnicity and gender but also class. I very much doubt a british coal miner in 1923 was as comparitively depressed living in virtual darkness and breathing coal dust compared to one of their descendants living in 1923.