AspieOtaku wrote:
wouldnt AS be a sub category of HFA?
I'd say that's probably one of the better ways to put it. It's not perfect, because there are people with Asperger's who can't live independently, can't hold a job, have problems with communication (not speech--communication)... It's not a hard-and-fast rule.
I would prefer just to dump the idea of functioning labels altogether, and say that autistic people come in a wide variety of ability levels in various areas; and that those diagnosed with Asperger's are the autistic people who can use spoken langauge, at least to some extent. Not to say that the classic autistics can't--it's just that the Aspies didn't have an early speech delay. In adulthood it really doesn't matter which is which; I often think I'd prefer to have an "autism spectrum disorder" diagnosis on my record rather than any specific subcategory because of how the "Asperger's" label forces me to explain to people that I can have some of the problems that classic autistics have, and that I don't have some of the problems stereotypically associated with Asperger's. Lately, I've just been telling doctors I have PDD-NOS, which is the label I most agree with, and vague enough that they have to at least gather some information about specifically how autism affects me.